CDC’s DEADLY 72-VACCINE childhood “schedule” under attack as CDC gets sued for maiming and killing untold numbers of U.S. kids and babies

The absolute absurdity of injecting a newborn with neurotoxins and carcinogens and then continuing to give that baby dozens of other dirty jabs until it gets leaky gut syndrome, leaky brain syndrome, auto-immune disorders, autism, severe allergies and brain damage is beyond comprehension. So finally the insanity is under review. The whole CDC childhood vaccine schedule may be dismantled soon thanks to Trump and RFK Jr.

A new lawsuit is challenging the foundation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) childhood immunization program, alleging that the agency has never conducted safety testing on the entire 72-dose vaccine schedule given to U.S. children. The complaint, filed last week in federal court by Drs. Paul Thomas and Kenneth P. Stoller and the nonprofit Stand for Health Freedom, claims the CDC’s framework violates federal law and the U.S. Constitution.

• Paul Thomas and Kenneth P. Stoller, along with Stand for Health Freedom, filed a federal lawsuit accusing the CDC of failing to test the cumulative safety of the 72-dose childhood vaccine schedule, calling it unconstitutional and unlawful.
• The plaintiffs argue the CDC ignored repeated recommendations from the Institute of Medicine to study the combined effects of vaccines, labeling the agency’s inaction “deliberate ignorance.”
• The lawsuit claims the CDC’s framework silences dissenting doctors, restricts valid medical exemptions, and violates children’s and parents’ constitutional rights, including free speech, informed consent, and bodily integrity.
• Plaintiffs seek a court order requiring the CDC to conduct rigorous safety studies of the full vaccine schedule, restore scientific integrity, and allow shared medical decision-making, with funding raised through community support.

BREAKING: CDC Sued for Pushing Illegal 72-Dose Childhood Vaccine Schedule

The suit names Susan Monarez, Ph.D., director of the CDC, as the defendant. The plaintiffs argue that the agency’s program amounts to a national medical experiment lacking scientific integrity. Attorney Rick Jaffe, representing the group, said the case “goes to the heart of the CDC’s childhood immunization program — a 72-plus dose medical intervention schedule that has never been tested.”

According to the complaint, the CDC’s vaccination guidelines are based only on short-term risks of individual vaccines and have never accounted for the cumulative effects of the schedule as a whole. Both the Institute of Medicine (now National Academy of Medicine) and other advisory bodies have urged the CDC to conduct such studies since at least 2002, but no comprehensive testing has ever been performed. The plaintiffs describe this refusal as “deliberate ignorance,” designed to avoid political and legal challenges to the program.

The lawsuit further alleges violations of the First Amendment (restricting physicians’ free speech) and the Fifth Amendment (due process and parental rights). It also accuses the agency of acting “arbitrarily and capriciously” under the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to consider key safety issues.

While officially only “recommendations,” the CDC schedule is widely adopted by states to set school vaccine requirements. According to the lawsuit, this framework is also used by state medical boards to discipline or even revoke licenses of doctors who deviate from the CDC’s strict guidelines. Both Dr. Thomas and Dr. Stoller lost their medical licenses after publishing or acting on research that questioned the schedule.

The plaintiffs argue that this system strips parents of true informed consent, prevents physicians from exercising independent medical judgment, and effectively silences scientific dissent. Children, they argue, are left vulnerable to chronic illness and adverse effects because no cumulative testing has ever been conducted.

On the same day the lawsuit was filed, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced that it would reinstate the long-dormant Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines, which had not convened since 1998. The plaintiffs welcomed this as a small first step but said it did nothing to address the lack of testing of the full schedule.

The case also connects the ballooning vaccine schedule to the rise of chronic disease in U.S. children, citing data that autism rates increased from 1 in 150 to 1 in 31 during the period in which the vaccine schedule expanded from 24 to over 72 doses.

The lawsuit seeks a declaration that the CDC’s framework is unconstitutional, as well as a court order requiring the agency to conduct scientifically rigorous cumulative safety studies. Plaintiffs hope the suit will generate public awareness and force transparency.

“This case exposes that structural failure,” Jaffe said. “I hope it sparks enough concern to make the schedule a matter of shared decision-making until it is conclusively proven safe.”

The case is expected to be funded entirely through community crowdfunding. Bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on experimental gene therapy injections that lead to early death, infertility, turbo cancer and Long-Vax-Syndrome.

Sources for this article include:

Pandemic.news

NaturalNews.com

FoxNews.com